UC Observer logo
UCObserver on SoundCloud UCObserver on YouTube UCObserver on Facebook UCObserver on Twitter UCObserver's RSS Feeds

Protest with a new beat

Once again, politically engaged musicians are singing for change. But this time it’s personal.

By Kevin Spurgaitis

Think protest music and it may still evoke images of folk artists Woody Guthrie and Pete Seeger strumming guitars and banjos, denouncing injustice in the 1930s and ’40s. Or countercultural icon Bob Dylan laying down the soundtrack for the discontent of the 1960s. Yet listen closely to music today and you’ll find rebelliousness in folk-rock, punk, country and everything in between. Not only has protest music diversified, it is more plentiful now than at any time since the late 1960s. But whereas protest songs during the 1960s addressed broad issues such as the Vietnam War and civil rights, the new wave of protest is more personal and doesn’t stop with appeals for peace. Most of the music is targeted at the actions and policies of one man: U.S. President George W. Bush.

“For better or worse, Bush has stirred up a lot of vitriol in the music community,” writes music critic David Browne in Entertainment Weekly. “There’s always been protest songs against presidents, but they have never been near to the level of venom you’re seeing now.”

Singers, both fledgling and iconic, are tapping into and helping to foment widespread discontent over Bush’s war in Iraq, the paranoia of a country threatened by terrorism, and the blacklisting of “anti-American” songs on Republican-friendly radio networks, such as Clear Channel and Citadel Communications. Hundreds of their MP3s now stream across the Internet, adding a new dimension to populist song-making.

Message music’s mainstream incarnations include the country-rock trio The Dixie Chicks, whose criticism of the Iraq invasion nearly cost them their careers, and Green Day, whose 2004 album, American Idiot, was awarded a Grammy for its lyrical criticism of American foreign policy and Bush himself. That same year saw the release of a Billboard-charting compilation entitled Rock Against Bush, a collection of sneeringly rebellious songs from mainstream acts such as Sum 41 and Offspring.

Some of the most spirited shots at the embattled president come from singer-songwriter Eddie Vedder, of the influential hard-rock band Pearl Jam. Even before the Bush administration embarked on the current war in Iraq, Vedder vehemently spoke out in opposition to U.S. foreign policy. In 2000, Vedder actively supported presidential candidate Ralph Nader and the idea of a third party in U.S. electoral politics. Before the 2004 presidential election, Pearl Jam and a coalition of other artists/activists barnstormed swing states on the wildly popular Vote for Change tour.

World Wide Suicide, the first single from Pearl Jam’s 2006 self-titled album, takes a ferocious swipe at leaders who “tell you to pray while the devil’s on their shoulder.”
Like Pearl Jam, Rage Against the Machine marries hard rock and revolutionary politics. Incendiary songs such as Township Rebellion, Killing in the Name, Testify and Voice of the Voiceless assail social injustices, while sold-out benefit concerts support causes ranging from Mexico’s Zapatista Front for National Liberation to Native American activist Leonard Peltier.

Veteran acts with roots in an earlier generation of protest music have found new currency in the movement against Bush and the Iraq war. During the Vietnam era, country-rock singer-songwriter Steve Earle cut his teeth in coffee houses. Later he participated in Concerts for a Landmine Free World and campaigned tirelessly to abolish the death penalty. His recent work is even more politicized. The Revolution Starts Now, which features several songs about the war in Iraq, coincided with the run-up to the 2004 U.S. presidential election and encouraged votes for Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry.

While some anti-Bush rock acts have been accused of preaching to the converted, the same criticism can hardly be levelled at the Virginia-born, Texas-raised Earle, whose songs are aimed at country-music audiences whom Bush and the Republican Party count among their staunchest supporters. Earle’s battles with alcohol and drug addiction, his stints in jail and his ongoing feud with the mainstream music industry only add to his revolutionary swagger.

Less caustic but no less influential is Bruce Springsteen, now more of a troubadour than the Jersey-shore rocker who soared to fame in the mid-1970s. Although Springsteen’s 2002 album The Rising seemed to justify vengeance for victims of Sept.11, his 2006 release of We Shall Overcome: The Seeger Sessions is simultaneously a tribute to vintage protest folk and a commentary on the evils and injustices of here and now. One of its most powerful cuts is Mrs. McGrath, a traditional Irish broadside telling the story of a mother whose son goes off to war in the name of patriotism, only to return physically and emotionally scarred.

If Springsteen’s message respectfully echoes a long tradition of protest, 62-year-old Canadian-born rocker Neil Young goes straight for the jugular. “Let’s impeach the president,” he cries in his 2007 album, Living With War. The compilation of anti-Bush and anti-war songs seethes with indignation, and is supported by a 100-voice choir.

Bush will not be president forever, and the Iraq war will someday be over. Only time will tell whether the new wave of protest music has the staying power of its ancestors. One thing is certain, though: causes may come and go, but the power of popular music as a force for change will endure.

Readers’ advisory: The discussion below is moderated by The UC Observer and facilitated by Intense Debate (ID), an online commentary system. The Observer reserves the right to edit or reject any comment it deems to be inappropriate. Approved comments may be further edited for length, clarity and accuracy, and published in the print edition of the magazine. Please note: readers do not need to sign up with ID to post their comments on ucobserver.org. We require only your user name and e-mail address. Your comments will be posted from Monday to Friday between 9:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Join the discussion today!

Announcement

New Observer editor and CEO, Jocelyn Bell. Photo by Lindsay Palmer

New editor named

by Observer Staff

Promotional Image

Editorials

David Wilson%

Observations

by David Wilson

A perfect send-off

Promotional Image

Video

ObserverDocs: My Year of Living Spiritually

by Observer Staff

Anne Bokma left the Dutch Reformed Church as a young adult and eventually became a member of the United Church and then the Unitarian Universalists. Having long explored the "spiritual but not religious" demographic as a writer, she decided to immerse herself in practices — like hiring a soul coach, secular choir-singing and forest bathing — for 12 months to find both enlightenment and entertainment.

Promotional Image

Society

November 2017

Trump country

by David Macfarlane

A northern Alabama county voted almost unanimously for Donald Trump in 2016. One year later, the writer, together with photographer Nigel Dickson, travels there to try to understand why.

Faith

November 2017

Involuntary pilgrim

by David Giuliano

The return of a tumour sets David Giuliano on a path he calls his ‘Camino de Cancer’

Faith

October 2017

A tale of two cancers

by Catherine Gordon

One year after the writer discovered she had breast cancer, her sister in California received the same diagnosis. They both recovered, but their experiences were worlds apart.

Society

November 2017

Trump country

by David Macfarlane

A northern Alabama county voted almost unanimously for Donald Trump in 2016. One year later, the writer, together with photographer Nigel Dickson, travels there to try to understand why.

Faith

November 2017

Involuntary pilgrim

by David Giuliano

The return of a tumour sets David Giuliano on a path he calls his ‘Camino de Cancer’

Faith

November 2017

Grey matter

by Trisha Elliott

Is consciousness just a function of the brain — or something more?

Promotional Image