UC Observer logo
UCObserver on SoundCloud UCObserver on YouTube UCObserver on Facebook UCObserver on Twitter UCObserver's RSS Feeds

Generations

We live in one world, and we must show solidarity with the oppressed

By Brian Platt

Filmmaker Quentin Tarantino once expressed the wish that if a million different people saw Pulp Fiction, they’d see a million different movies. I like that sort of thing: we can generate unique interpretations from the same source, depending on our own values and experiences. I feel that way about the idea of social justice. Almost everyone I know in the United Church defines their own personal mission, and that of the church, as one of promoting and fostering social justice around the world. But, just like the Pulp Fiction audience, everyone has their own idea of what that means, and those different ideas don’t always jive.

So, as should be done after watching any great film, I’m going to unpack my interpretation in the hope that it generates some good discussion.

Any advocate of social justice should accept two principles as basic tenets. The first is that human rights are universal. The second is that we live in one world, and we must show solidarity with the oppressed. Now here’s my problem: too many of my friends are uncompromising partisans of socially just causes only up to the point where they’re on the same side of an issue as American foreign policy.

Yes, this is about Afghanistan. No, it’s not an argument for supporting the military strategy in the region, which is certainly open to debate. This is a plea for the political left in Canada to walk and chew gum at the same time. Share your concerns over the larger strategic picture, but let’s declare this without reservation: the people in Afghanistan are fellow human beings, and their struggle against the reactionary political movement that ruled their country as a medieval religious fiefdom is our struggle, too.

Instead, every peace group I can think of is speaking the language of stability and a return to the status quo so Canada can extricate itself. Bringing our troops home is characterized as “anti-war,” a label that is only accurate if you define war by its content of Canadian soldiers. No serious analyst doubts that civil war would erupt if we left. Only right-wing politicians express horror at the thought of negotiating a political settlement with the radical theo-cracy. There is something wrong with this picture.

Progressive Canadians might ask themselves a few questions at this point: What exactly are the bargaining chips in these negotiations? What of the overwhelming majority of Afghans who, when polled, support the overthrow of the Taliban? By promoting negotiations, what are you signing away on behalf of the Afghan people that you wouldn’t accept for a moment in your own life?

I know things aren’t quite this straightforward; Afghanistan’s politics  are notoriously inscrutable. But I’m frustrated. Just once, I’d liked to see a peace rally organized with the intention of raising money for books in Afghanistan, or declaring solidarity for the country’s nascent labour unions, independent media and women’s rights networks.

According to the United Nations, Afghanistan is the fifth least developed country in the world. When the Taliban was in power, Afghanistan lacked infrastructure, schools, health care and women in public life — all of which are now being developed. Afghanistan today represents one of the most compelling causes of social justice in the world. I’m proud that Canada is taking a leading role.
Author's photo
Brian Platt is a master of journalism student at Carleton University.
Readers’ advisory: The discussion below is moderated by The UC Observer and facilitated by Intense Debate (ID), an online commentary system. The Observer reserves the right to edit or reject any comment it deems to be inappropriate. Approved comments may be further edited for length, clarity and accuracy, and published in the print edition of the magazine. Please note: readers do not need to sign up with ID to post their comments on ucobserver.org. We require only your user name and e-mail address. Your comments will be posted from Monday to Friday between 9:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Join the discussion today!
Promotional Image

Editorials

David Wilson%

Observations

by David Wilson

A perfect send-off

Promotional Image

Video

ObserverDocs: My Year of Living Spiritually

by Observer Staff

Anne Bokma left the Dutch Reformed Church as a young adult and eventually became a member of the United Church and then the Unitarian Universalists. Having long explored the "spiritual but not religious" (SBNR) demographic as a writer, she decided to immerse herself in SBNR practices for 12 months to find both enlightenment and entertainment.

Promotional Image

Society

November 2017

Trump country

by David Macfarlane

A northern Alabama county voted almost unanimously for Donald Trump in 2016. One year later, the writer, together with photographer Nigel Dickson, travels there to try to understand why.

Faith

November 2017

Involuntary pilgrim

by David Giuliano

The return of a tumour sets David Giuliano on a path he calls his ‘Camino de Cancer’

Faith

October 2017

A tale of two cancers

by Catherine Gordon

One year after the writer discovered she had breast cancer, her sister in California received the same diagnosis. They both recovered, but their experiences were worlds apart.

Society

November 2017

Trump country

by David Macfarlane

A northern Alabama county voted almost unanimously for Donald Trump in 2016. One year later, the writer, together with photographer Nigel Dickson, travels there to try to understand why.

Faith

November 2017

Involuntary pilgrim

by David Giuliano

The return of a tumour sets David Giuliano on a path he calls his ‘Camino de Cancer’

Faith

November 2017

Grey matter

by Trisha Elliott

Is consciousness just a function of the brain — or something more?

Promotional Image