UC Observer logo
UCObserver on SoundCloud UCObserver on YouTube UCObserver on Facebook UCObserver on Twitter UCObserver's RSS Feeds

Decoding the Bible

Did Jesus make mistakes?

By Sandra Beardsall

It was 1763, and Rev. John Wesley was in trouble again. Wesley, a vocal evangelical reformer in the English church, was accustomed to conflict. Church leaders were often hostile to his theology, preachers and chapels, which competed for the attention and loyalty of the Anglican flock. This time, however, Wesley’s problems lay not only with his usual opponents, but also with friends in the evangelical movement and with some of his own Methodist co-workers.

The issue was, of all things, a “perfectionist outbreak.” Christians, it seems, have a long history of trying to sort out how Jesus — and the rest of us — might model a mistake-free life.

John Wesley held a lifelong fascination with the experience of becoming holy. He termed this process “Christian perfection,” “entire sanctification” or “perfect love.” Wesley reasoned that being forgiven and set free was not the end of Christian life, but rather its beginning. It seemed to him both scriptural and logical that to live in a constant loving relationship with Jesus Christ would involve a gradual elimination of all sin and wrongdoing from the believer’s life. His brother Charles also carried the perfection banner and evoked it in many of his hymns, including Love Divine, All Loves Excelling, with its plea, “Finish, then, thy new creation; pure and spotless let us be.” Wesley reasoned that a Christian might attain this perfection just before death. Methodists and other evangelicals debated this, but it remained more a suggestion than a quarrel until the perfectionist outbreak.

In 1760, some Methodists in Yorkshire told Wesley they had been “cleansed from all unrighteousness.” Similar reports began to emerge from other parts of the country. People not only believed in Christian perfection but claimed to have attained it — and not on their deathbeds. The issue came to a head when two prominent Methodist leaders in London declared that their entire sanctification had endowed them with prophetic and healing powers. One even announced that the world would end on Feb. 28, 1763.     

Wesley faced a dilemma: how could he distance himself from this excess without having to give up his treasured belief in perfect love?

Did Jesus make mistakes? The question is similar to the Wesleys’ contemplation of perfection. It sets a trap and can get us equally entangled. If we say Jesus never erred, his credibility as a human being is in question. If we say he did make mistakes, his divinity gets murky. Divinity, humanity, perfection, error: how do we put them together?

The Christian Scriptures do not discuss Jesus and mistakes. The few times the word “wrong” appears in the Gospels, it is usually Jesus telling people that their perceptions are mistaken about God and God’s realm. Perfection, however, gets considerable attention. The Greek word for perfect means “completed” or “fulfilled.” Matthew’s Jesus is blunt: “If you wish to be perfect, go sell your possessions and give your money to the poor” (Mt. 19:21). Paul states that Jesus “knew no sin” and that it is possible for believers to become perfect. The Letter to the Hebrews highlights perfection. Jesus is made perfect through his sufferings (Heb. 2:10) and then becomes the “perfecter of our faith” (Heb. 12:2). Believers can and should “go on to perfection” (Heb. 6:1). Some of our Methodist forebears claimed to have done just that.

In response to the 1760s perfectionist outbreak, Wesley tried to clarify his position. He acknowledged that Christians cannot ever know everything or be free from making mistakes. However, he simply could not deny the power of grace: the gift and promise that in Jesus Christ something actually happens in us. We can now love both God and neighbour in a more whole and pure way. As Jesus did.

The Bible shows us a Jesus who was in constant dialogue — with friends, with adversaries, with the needy, with the haughty. Good dialogue involves give and take, receptivity and reconsideration. Jesus did that. Still, in describing Jesus’ faithfulness to God and to the new way of living God had sent him to proclaim, Scripture shows us a man who did not make mistakes. He loved God and creation with a complete, fulfilled, “perfect” love. The Wesleys believed Christians could do the same. Can we? If so, what would it look like in us, our church, our world?
Readers’ advisory: The discussion below is moderated by The UC Observer and facilitated by Intense Debate (ID), an online commentary system. The Observer reserves the right to edit or reject any comment it deems to be inappropriate. Approved comments may be further edited for length, clarity and accuracy, and published in the print edition of the magazine. Please note: readers do not need to sign up with ID to post their comments on ucobserver.org. We require only your user name and e-mail address. Your comments will be posted from Monday to Friday between 9:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Join the discussion today!

Announcement

New Observer editor and CEO, Jocelyn Bell. Photo by Lindsay Palmer

New editor named

by Observer Staff

Promotional Image

Editorials

David Wilson%

Observations

by David Wilson

A perfect send-off

Promotional Image

Video

ObserverDocs: My Year of Living Spiritually

by Observer Staff

Anne Bokma left the Dutch Reformed Church as a young adult and eventually became a member of the United Church and then the Unitarian Universalists. Having long explored the "spiritual but not religious" demographic as a writer, she decided to immerse herself in practices — like hiring a soul coach, secular choir-singing and forest bathing — for 12 months to find both enlightenment and entertainment.

Promotional Image

Society

November 2017

Trump country

by David Macfarlane

A northern Alabama county voted almost unanimously for Donald Trump in 2016. One year later, the writer, together with photographer Nigel Dickson, travels there to try to understand why.

Faith

November 2017

Involuntary pilgrim

by David Giuliano

The return of a tumour sets David Giuliano on a path he calls his ‘Camino de Cancer’

Faith

October 2017

A tale of two cancers

by Catherine Gordon

One year after the writer discovered she had breast cancer, her sister in California received the same diagnosis. They both recovered, but their experiences were worlds apart.

Society

November 2017

Trump country

by David Macfarlane

A northern Alabama county voted almost unanimously for Donald Trump in 2016. One year later, the writer, together with photographer Nigel Dickson, travels there to try to understand why.

Faith

November 2017

Involuntary pilgrim

by David Giuliano

The return of a tumour sets David Giuliano on a path he calls his ‘Camino de Cancer’

Faith

November 2017

Grey matter

by Trisha Elliott

Is consciousness just a function of the brain — or something more?

Promotional Image