UC Observer logo
UCObserver on SoundCloud UCObserver on YouTube UCObserver on Facebook UCObserver on Twitter UCObserver's RSS Feeds

Generations

Debate about God is a good thing when done intelligently

By Brian Platt

The two greatest physicists of the 20th century, Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr, spent most of their lives at loggerheads over quantum mechanics. Einstein believed deeply in a material, deterministic world; Bohr’s model of the atom, with its physically unpredictable electrons, violated the very core of Einstein’s worldview. “No,” Einstein would famously insist during their heated debates, “God doesn’t play dice with the universe.” Finally, an exasperated Bohr burst out a brilliant reply: “Einstein, stop telling God what to do!”

It certainly raises the stakes of a debate when one starts invoking God’s intentions, doesn’t it? How do you challenge someone when they appropriate God’s authority to their side of an argument? As Bohr knew very well, Einstein was speaking in a mostly metaphorical sense — God as the embodiment of the complexity of the universe. Both scientists understood the limits of such rhetorical language and used it for the constructive purpose of advancing the argument.

But others are not so metaphorical or subtle. In June, the demagogues who rule Iran didn’t just fix an election result: Ayatollah Khamenei pronounced the outcome “a divine assessment.” How should one respond to this? The thousands of Iranians who doubted that it was God who tabulated poll results impossibly early and shut down the cellphone network were met in the streets by a phalanx of black-clad security forces.

Last January, a Canadian umbrella group of atheist and humanist organizations launched a campaign of public transit advertisements. The ads carried the cheeky and rather cunning slogan, “There’s probably no God, so stop worrying and enjoy your life.” (The mad geniuses at the United Church’s Emerging Spirit headquarters produced a good response to this, which you can see at wondercafe.ca.)

I have yet to see the atheist bus ads in person. That’s because Vancouver’s transit authority decided to ban them. The reason: no ads are allowed that may “cause offence to any person or group of persons or create controversy.” Got that, Vancouverites? Transit advertisements are for selling you overhyped products, not for provoking thought — let alone controversy!

This will change with a Supreme Court ruling in July that struck down Vancouver’s ban as a violation of the Charter right to free expression. The decision will almost certainly apply to religious advertisements as well. Now we’ll be able to see these atheist bus ads, think about them and make up our own minds. Is anybody in the United Church afraid of such a thing? Why would you be?

Debate about God, when done intelligently, is a very good thing. We need more of it. A century ago in Copenhagen, two brilliant minds used  such debate to decipher the mysteries of the physical universe — launching a scientific revolution in the process. Today in Tehran, where the freedom to debate religious doctrine is violently repressed, ordinary citizens risk everything in their struggle to gain it. Vancouver’s attempt to keep debate about God away from the public space is a symptom of seriously misplaced priorities.

Religious debate is a fundamental tenet of human freedom. So stop worrying and enjoy it.

Author's photo
Brian Platt is a master of journalism student at Carleton University.
Readers’ advisory: The discussion below is moderated by The UC Observer and facilitated by Intense Debate (ID), an online commentary system. The Observer reserves the right to edit or reject any comment it deems to be inappropriate. Approved comments may be further edited for length, clarity and accuracy, and published in the print edition of the magazine. Please note: readers do not need to sign up with ID to post their comments on ucobserver.org. We require only your user name and e-mail address. Your comments will be posted from Monday to Friday between 9:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Join the discussion today!

Announcement

New Observer editor and CEO, Jocelyn Bell. Photo by Lindsay Palmer

New editor named

by Observer Staff

Promotional Image

Editorials

David Wilson%

Observations

by David Wilson

A perfect send-off

Promotional Image

Video

ObserverDocs: My Year of Living Spiritually

by Observer Staff

Anne Bokma left the Dutch Reformed Church as a young adult and eventually became a member of the United Church and then the Unitarian Universalists. Having long explored the "spiritual but not religious" demographic as a writer, she decided to immerse herself in practices — like hiring a soul coach, secular choir-singing and forest bathing — for 12 months to find both enlightenment and entertainment.

Promotional Image

Society

November 2017

Trump country

by David Macfarlane

A northern Alabama county voted almost unanimously for Donald Trump in 2016. One year later, the writer, together with photographer Nigel Dickson, travels there to try to understand why.

Faith

November 2017

Involuntary pilgrim

by David Giuliano

The return of a tumour sets David Giuliano on a path he calls his ‘Camino de Cancer’

Faith

October 2017

A tale of two cancers

by Catherine Gordon

One year after the writer discovered she had breast cancer, her sister in California received the same diagnosis. They both recovered, but their experiences were worlds apart.

Society

November 2017

Trump country

by David Macfarlane

A northern Alabama county voted almost unanimously for Donald Trump in 2016. One year later, the writer, together with photographer Nigel Dickson, travels there to try to understand why.

Faith

November 2017

Involuntary pilgrim

by David Giuliano

The return of a tumour sets David Giuliano on a path he calls his ‘Camino de Cancer’

Faith

November 2017

Grey matter

by Trisha Elliott

Is consciousness just a function of the brain — or something more?

Promotional Image