UC Observer logo
UCObserver on SoundCloud UCObserver on YouTube UCObserver on Facebook UCObserver on Twitter UCObserver's RSS Feeds

Conservative Christians in the U.S. still have muscle

Vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin may well represent the fullest flowering of the Christian right yet

By David Wilson

What does Sarah Palin have to do with a couple of dozen books set out in the mid-1990s on a dining room table in suburban Washington, D.C.? Plenty, I think. First, the books. They belonged to the library system in Fairfax County, a well-to-do enclave west of the United States’ capital. A conservative Christian group campaigning for “family-friendly” libraries was pushing to have them removed from the shelves. The leader of the group had brought home a box full of “unfriendly” titles and marked them with yellow stickies so I could see the salacious parts for myself when I arrived to interview her.

I was more intrigued by the campaign she led than by the naughty bits in the books. It was typical of the guerrilla tactics being used at the time by various groups gathered under the banner of the Christian right. Instead of aiming for the stars — think of Pat Robertson’s quixotic run for the presidency in 1988 — the Christian right had shifted its formidable organizing focus to the grassroots. The Fairfax County library group was one of hundreds of cells engaged in local skirmishes across the United States. Collectively, they would lay the foundation for an ultra-conservative social revolution.

Schooled in the art of organizing by tech-savvy groups such as the Robertson-founded Christian Coalition, the library crusaders enlisted volunteers from the region’s big evangelical churches to run telephone, fax and mass-mailing campaigns. They packed library board meetings and eventually managed to wring a few concessions from exasperated board members. But the bigger achievement was to establish themselves as a force to be reckoned with.

The same is true on the national political stage. The Christian right still has muscle and knows how to flex it — it delivered the state of Ohio and the U.S. presidency to George W. Bush in 2004 — but it doesn’t get the attention it once did because it has inched into the mainstream. Christian Coalition architect Ralph Reed goes to work for Bush-Cheney in two successive presidential campaigns and raises money for John McCain in 2008, and it’s no big deal. No big deal, either, that federal agencies such as the Justice Department and advisory committees on HIV/AIDS and reproductive health are full of appointees with links to the Christian right. The Christian right has become as familiar a part of the landscape as Wal-Mart.

Enter Sarah Palin. Central casting couldn’t have dreamed up a vice-presidential candidate with better Christian right credentials. She flirts with end-times and holy-war theology. Opposes abortion rights, same-sex marriage and state health benefits for same-sex partners. Favours abstinence education over sex education. Supports teaching creationism in public schools. Supports the right to carry handguns. Yet Palin doesn’t flaunt her faith. She doesn’t need to because it’s understood and, for the most part, accepted as part of the dynamic of contemporary politics. If Palin flaunts anything, it’s the effortlessly held conviction that she’s mainstream. “You’re mainstream, too!” is her unspoken rallying cry. Palin’s stunning lack of depth is beside the point. It’s the packaging that’s for sale.

The stealthiest warrior is the one who hides in plain sight. For that reason, Palin may well represent the fullest flowering of the Christian right yet. She did not have to be invented. She sprang naturally from soil the Christian right has been tilling for 20 years. That soil will remain fertile for years to come, whether Palin wins or loses on Nov. 4.


Author's photo
David Wilson is the editor-publisher of The Observer.
Readers’ advisory: The discussion below is moderated by The UC Observer and facilitated by Intense Debate (ID), an online commentary system. The Observer reserves the right to edit or reject any comment it deems to be inappropriate. Approved comments may be further edited for length, clarity and accuracy, and published in the print edition of the magazine. Please note: readers do not need to sign up with ID to post their comments on ucobserver.org. We require only your user name and e-mail address. Your comments will be posted from Monday to Friday between 9:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Join the discussion today!
Promotional Image

Editorials

David Wilson%

Observations

by David Wilson

If statues could talk

Promotional Image

Video

ObserverDocs: Stolen Mother

by Observer Staff

The daughter and adoptive mother of one of the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women share their story

Promotional Image

Society

July 2017

From far and wide

by Various Writers

Meet 11 immigrants who are putting down new roots

World

June 2017

A suitcase for Cuba

by Christopher Levan

You’ll find more than giveaway toiletries and hand-me-downs in the writer's luggage. Each carefully chosen gift offers a glimpse into the lives of Cubans today.

Justice

June 2017

Undocumented

by Kristy Woudstra

Up to half a million people are living in Canada without official status. The ‘sanctuary city’ movement is growing, but the fear of deportation persists.

World

June 2017

Resisting genocide

by Sally Armstrong

In August 2014, ISIS attacked Iraq’s Yazidis, slaughtering thousands and forcing women and girls into sexual slavery. Today, the survivors are fighting for their ancient way of life.

Society

April 2017

Dear Grandkids

by Various Writers

Six acclaimed Canadian authors write letters from the heart

Society

March 2017

Called to resist

by Paul Wilson

Liberal Christians in the United States test their faith against a demagogue

Promotional Image