UC Observer logo
UCObserver on SoundCloud UCObserver on YouTube UCObserver on Facebook UCObserver on Twitter UCObserver's RSS Feeds

Better lines of communication

Make no mistake: dialogue between the United Church and Canadian Jewish groups can't be confined to the boardroom.

By David Wilson

Whether it was over a tray of goodies at a party, in a restaurant or during a chance meeting on the street, my Jewish friends had pretty much the same message for me last fall: “I’m not very happy with the United Church.”

As they saw it, the United Church had flirted with something approaching anti-Semitism when it considered a proposal for a boycott of academic, cultural and economic ties with Israel at its General Council meeting in Kelowna, B.C., during the summer. Their chagrin was amplified by news stories reporting the church had given a small grant to the founding meeting of the Canadian chapter of Independent Jewish Voices (IJV), which supports the Palestinian call for boycott, disvestment and sanctions against Israel. Chagrin turned to outrage when a newspaper columnist charged that one of IJV Canada’s founders had cited anti-Semitic 9/11 conspiracy theorists in a 2006 essay.

I did my best to explain what had actually happened at General Council: a regional court of the church had sent the boycott proposal up the food chain, and under the church’s rules, commissioners in Kelowna were obliged to consider it. They had turned it down and repudiated inflammatory language in the material that accompanied it. Officially, the church had also begun to distance itself from IJV.

My friends remained suspicious. Echoing public statements by Canada’s main Jewish organization, the Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC), they felt this was mostly damage control. As far as they were concerned, the United Church had shown its true colours: it was anti-Israel and pro-Palestinian — perhaps even anti-Semitic.

It’s not my position to defend the United Church, but I found myself defending it a lot last fall, particularly on the question of anti-Semitism. I would trot out an analogy. It’s perfectly possible to criticize, say, the government of India without being anti-South Asian. Surely it’s possible to criticize the actions of Israel’s government without being anti-Semitic. Some of my friends saw the point, others didn’t.

In a story that appears this month ("Back from the brink"), Toronto freelancer Caley Moore describes the rift that opened between the CJC and the United Church in the wake of General Council. As Moore reports, a summit earlier this year appeared to lay a bridge across the divide. The church affirmed the CJC as its counterpart, and the CJC acknowledged the diversity of views within the United Church on the Middle East.

Make no mistake — that diversity includes many reasonable people at the grassroots who feel that a church with a long tradition of advocating for justice must not pull up lame when it comes to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. They believe that the church needs to hear different voices from the Jewish community as well as the voices of Palestinians, and they take offence to suggestions that inviting those voices into the conversation belies undercurrents of anti-Semitism.

It was good to hear that church officials and CJC leaders had agreed to talk some more. But I think it’s clear that the dialogue can’t be confined to the boardroom. It needs to take place at street level, too, and focus on rebuilding trust between communities. An agreement to encourage better lines of communication at the grassroots would be a symbolic gesture of reconciliation for both organizations. Bridges that are supported from below are always the strongest.

Author's photo
David Wilson is the editor-publisher of The Observer.
Readers’ advisory: The discussion below is moderated by The UC Observer and facilitated by Intense Debate (ID), an online commentary system. The Observer reserves the right to edit or reject any comment it deems to be inappropriate. Approved comments may be further edited for length, clarity and accuracy, and published in the print edition of the magazine. Please note: readers do not need to sign up with ID to post their comments on ucobserver.org. We require only your user name and e-mail address. Your comments will be posted from Monday to Friday between 9:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Join the discussion today!
Promotional Image


David Wilson%


by David Wilson

If statues could talk

Promotional Image


ObserverDocs: Stolen Mother

by Observer Staff

The daughter and adoptive mother of one of the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women share their story

Promotional Image


July 2017

From far and wide

by Various Writers

Meet 11 immigrants who are putting down new roots


June 2017

A suitcase for Cuba

by Christopher Levan

You’ll find more than giveaway toiletries and hand-me-downs in the writer's luggage. Each carefully chosen gift offers a glimpse into the lives of Cubans today.


June 2017


by Kristy Woudstra

Up to half a million people are living in Canada without official status. The ‘sanctuary city’ movement is growing, but the fear of deportation persists.


June 2017

Resisting genocide

by Sally Armstrong

In August 2014, ISIS attacked Iraq’s Yazidis, slaughtering thousands and forcing women and girls into sexual slavery. Today, the survivors are fighting for their ancient way of life.


April 2017

Dear Grandkids

by Various Writers

Six acclaimed Canadian authors write letters from the heart


March 2017

Called to resist

by Paul Wilson

Liberal Christians in the United States test their faith against a demagogue

Promotional Image