UC Observer logo
UCObserver on SoundCloud UCObserver on YouTube UCObserver on Facebook UCObserver on Twitter UCObserver's RSS Feeds

The new look of discontent

Young people drove the 1960s counterculture, and they're the backbone of the Occupy movement. But the similarities end there.

By David Wilson

I caught up with my old friend Steve one night last fall. Over pizza, we shared news of parents, kids, careers and travels. Standard stuff. But one bit of news took me by surprise. Earlier in the day, Steve said, he had ventured downtown to the park where Occupy Toronto had been camped out since mid-October. I asked him why. “Just curious,” he said.

Maybe I shouldn’t have been surprised. As products of the 1960s counterculture, we’re both acutely aware of how, for better or worse, a widespread movement of young people can shape an entire generation. The Occupy movement that started in New York last year and quickly went global is the biggest mass mobilization of young people in half a century.

The wrinkle now is that Steve and I find ourselves in much the same position as our parents did 40-odd years ago — on the outside looking in. Our kids are in their late teens and early 20s. While they haven’t unfurled their sleeping bags yet, they’re generally sympathetic toward the Occupy movement. And they’re remarkably unperturbed by the movement’s lack of agenda and specificity. For them, it’s enough that it’s happening.

This is not much different from how most young people a generation ago saw the counterculture. The counterculture was a lot of things, but fundamentally it embodied a general discontent over the quality of opportunity afforded to youth at the time. Take the famous scene from the 1967 film The Graduate where Dustin Hoffman, playing a recent college grad, is pulled aside by one of his parents’ friends at a party thrown in his honour. “I just want to say one word to you. Just one word,” counsels the avuncular businessman. “Plastics.” Young people in the 1960s rejected the assumption that they would live their lives in the service of an economic machine that demanded conformity and created an insatiable appetite for things that weren’t necessary. The counterculture insisted that life could be so much richer than that.

The Occupy movement, by contrast, seems to have coalesced around discontent over an absence of opportunity. Doors that had been creaking shut slammed tight after the economic meltdown in 2008, and for the most part have remained so. Young people facing a future of dead-end jobs or no jobs at all have woken up to realize they have more in common with the marginalized than they do the middle classes into which most were born. Seeing rampant greed and corruption at the top of the economic food chain, indifference in the established political order and the continued degradation of their planet, they’re reaching out to the most tangible opportunity available — each other.

United Church Moderator Mardi Tindal got it right last fall when she wrote, “I see the movement as both a search for hope and a statement of hope, made by people who have come to believe that something is deeply wrong in the staggering inequality of our current society. I don’t think it is required of anyone to provide a complete, documented solution before they’re allowed to express concern. To the contrary, recognizing that ‘something is not right’ is the essential first step toward defining change.”

Most Occupy camps either shut down or were forced to shut down for the winter. This doesn’t mean the movement evaporated. If anything, expect to see it stronger and better organized when it re-emerges with a global day of protest on May 1. The tent cities, with their ragtag populations and extravagant democracies, will no doubt spring up again, and there will no doubt be confrontations with the authorities. This year, instead of demanding more clarity from the movement, I’ll make an effort to check out Occupy for myself. Maybe I’ll give my friend Steve a call, and we’ll go together.  



Author's photo
David Wilson is the editor-publisher of The Observer.
Readers’ advisory: The discussion below is moderated by The UC Observer and facilitated by Intense Debate (ID), an online commentary system. The Observer reserves the right to edit or reject any comment it deems to be inappropriate. Approved comments may be further edited for length, clarity and accuracy, and published in the print edition of the magazine. Please note: readers do not need to sign up with ID to post their comments on ucobserver.org. We require only your user name and e-mail address. Your comments will be posted from Monday to Friday between 9:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Join the discussion today!
Promotional Image

Editorials

David Wilson%

Observations

by David Wilson

If statues could talk

Promotional Image

Video

ObserverDocs: Stolen Mother

by Observer Staff

The daughter and adoptive mother of one of the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women share their story

Promotional Image

Society

July 2017

From far and wide

by Various Writers

Meet 11 immigrants who are putting down new roots

World

June 2017

A suitcase for Cuba

by Christopher Levan

You’ll find more than giveaway toiletries and hand-me-downs in the writer's luggage. Each carefully chosen gift offers a glimpse into the lives of Cubans today.

Justice

June 2017

Undocumented

by Kristy Woudstra

Up to half a million people are living in Canada without official status. The ‘sanctuary city’ movement is growing, but the fear of deportation persists.

World

June 2017

Resisting genocide

by Sally Armstrong

In August 2014, ISIS attacked Iraq’s Yazidis, slaughtering thousands and forcing women and girls into sexual slavery. Today, the survivors are fighting for their ancient way of life.

Society

April 2017

Dear Grandkids

by Various Writers

Six acclaimed Canadian authors write letters from the heart

Society

March 2017

Called to resist

by Paul Wilson

Liberal Christians in the United States test their faith against a demagogue

Promotional Image