UC Observer logo
UCObserver on SoundCloud UCObserver on YouTube UCObserver on Facebook UCObserver on Twitter UCObserver's RSS Feeds

Wishing a farewell to arms

The recent Navy Yard shooting in the U.S. sparks the question: is there no way to prevent Americans from killing each other with guns?

By Dennis Gruending

The recent shooting death of 13 Americans at the Navy Yard military centre in Washington D.C. is a tragic but commonplace occurrence. Mother Jones magazine says that there have now been five mass shootings in the U.S. this year, with more than 40 people injured and killed. In 2011, there were 11,000 gun-related homicides in the country. It begs the question: is there no way to prevent Americans from killing one another with firearms? Writing in The Walrus magazine, American writer Chris Hedges says, “Violence, at home and abroad, has been a constant in America. The gun culture Canadians and Europeans find hard to fathom is its natural expression.” So is he right?   

Sadly, the ritual is familiar. There is a jarring media announcement about a mass shooting. Police provide forensic details, and public officials offer condolences and prayers. Then the anguished funerals occur, such as those in Newtown, Conn. after 20 young children and seven adults died in a horrific killing spree at Sandy Hook Elementary School. But nothing really changes as a result.

The perpetrators often show signs of mental illness, as did Aaron Alexis at the Navy Yard. But why do Alexis and others have such easy access to assault weapons and semi-automatic handguns?  Following the shooting deaths at Sandy Hook, one American politician asked why and how weapons used to kill on the battlefield are so easily available to U.S. consumers.

Granted, the number of gun-related homicides has declined in recent years, yet the U.S. rate is still about six times more than that of Canada and 30 times more than that of the U.K.

After the horror in Newton, U.S. President Barack Obama finally found his courage. “We can’t tolerate this anymore,” he told the press. “These tragedies must end. And to end them, we must change.” Obama also appointed U.S. Vice-President Joe Biden to lead a task force to make recommendations. The most likely first step would be to resume a ban on assault weapons with high-capacity magazines.

Meanwhile, the National Rifle Association (NRA) is lobby central for the $11.7 billion gun industry. Even after the carnage at Sandy Hook, the NRA came out swinging at Obama and anyone else supporting stronger gun safety laws. Americans already own an estimated 300 million guns, according to the Geneva-based Small Arms Survey, the leading source of international information about firearms. Nevertheless, the NRA and a good number of politicians actually claim that the country would be safer if more people carried them.

Obama says that 80 to 90 per cent of people agree with him, and yet he still cannot get legislation for stricter gun safety laws enacted. Perhaps, as economist and Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz has put it, vested interests have captured the legislative process, repeatedly frustrating the desires of ordinary Americans.

This is unpleasant to contemplate, but it’s a less disturbing conclusion than that of Chris Hedges – that Americans, themselves, have a persistent and savage addiction to firearms.     

Author's photo
Dennis Gruending is an Ottawa-based author, blogger and a former Member of Parliament. His work will appear on the second and fourth Thursday of the month. His Pulpit and Politics blog can be found at www.dennisgruending.ca.
Readers’ advisory: The discussion below is moderated by The UC Observer and facilitated by Intense Debate (ID), an online commentary system. The Observer reserves the right to edit or reject any comment it deems to be inappropriate. Approved comments may be further edited for length, clarity and accuracy, and published in the print edition of the magazine. Please note: readers do not need to sign up with ID to post their comments on ucobserver.org. We require only your user name and e-mail address. Your comments will be posted from Monday to Friday between 9:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Join the discussion today!
Promotional Image

Editorials

David Wilson%

Observations

by David Wilson

A perfect send-off

Promotional Image

Video

ObserverDocs: A Tale of Two Cancers

by Observer Staff

Catherine Gordon's October 2017 feature for The Observer, 'A tale of two cancers,' recently caught the eye of U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders and his Washington, D.C.-based team, and inspired a short documentary. Gordon talks about the experience of writing the article and participating in the film.

Promotional Image

Society

November 2017

Trump country

by David Macfarlane

A northern Alabama county voted almost unanimously for Donald Trump in 2016. One year later, the writer, together with photographer Nigel Dickson, travels there to try to understand why.

Faith

November 2017

Involuntary pilgrim

by David Giuliano

The return of a tumour sets David Giuliano on a path he calls his ‘Camino de Cancer’

Faith

October 2017

A tale of two cancers

by Catherine Gordon

One year after the writer discovered she had breast cancer, her sister in California received the same diagnosis. They both recovered, but their experiences were worlds apart.

Society

November 2017

Trump country

by David Macfarlane

A northern Alabama county voted almost unanimously for Donald Trump in 2016. One year later, the writer, together with photographer Nigel Dickson, travels there to try to understand why.

Faith

November 2017

Involuntary pilgrim

by David Giuliano

The return of a tumour sets David Giuliano on a path he calls his ‘Camino de Cancer’

Faith

November 2017

Grey matter

by Trisha Elliott

Is consciousness just a function of the brain — or something more?

Promotional Image