UC Observer logo
UCObserver on SoundCloud UCObserver on YouTube UCObserver on Facebook UCObserver on Twitter UCObserver's RSS Feeds

Disheartened

Groups have dire predictions for Canada’s health accord

By Dennis Gruending

An existing health-care accord between Ottawa and the provinces and territories will expire on March 31, 2014. And the long-term consequences are alarming.  

Canada has a public, single payer health-care system for visits to the doctor and stays in hospital. When Medicare was introduced in the 1960s, its costs were shared by Ottawa and the provinces on a fifty-fifty basis. But that arrangement has changed and will continue to do so even more dramatically in the future, given a unilateral change announced in 2011 by Jim Flaherty, the federal finance minister who recently resigned the position.

According to a 2013 study by Canadian actuaries, Ottawa’s health-care transfers, which had once accounted for 50 percent of publicly funded health-care spending, fell to 21 percent in 2012. That percentage would drop to a mere 14 percent by 2037 under the changes announced by the federal government three years ago. 

Jean-Denis Frechette, Canada’s parliamentary budget officer, says that the change announced in 2011 will set in motion Ottawa’s downloading of health-care costs to provinces and territories — most of whom can ill afford to foot the bill.

Up until now, the Canadian system has worked well. Nearly everyone has access to doctors and hospital care, and Canada’s total spending on health as a percentage of our Gross Domestic Product — more than 11 percent in 2010 — is comparable to that in similar industrialized countries and considerably less than that in the United States.  But there have been problems, too, and fears that an aging population will place further stress on the system. 

In 2004, then-Prime Minister Paul Martin negotiated an accord that added $41-billion in federal spending through 2014. Provincial and territorial governments fully expected to negotiate a new agreement by March 31 of this year. Flaherty, however, stunned them in December 2011 by unilaterally announcing terms through to 2024. He said that the provinces and territories could take it or leave it. 

Prime Minister Stephen Harper has been accused of having a secret agenda to dismantle public health care. Prior to the May 2011 federal election, he attempted to put that issue to rest by promising continued financial support for public health care. In the short-term, Harper can argue that he kept that promise. But what are the consequences of the unilateral funding announcement?  

In his new book, The Longer I’m Prime Minister, journalist Paul Wells writes that Harper pursues his conservative goals incrementally.  The health-care announcement may well fit this mould. A frontal attack on Medicare would be politically suicidal for the Conservatives, but a slowing of health transfers to the provinces over a period of many years would lead to increased frustration among people using the service — and a demand for alternatives, including more privately offered services. 

This scenario is not lost on groups, such as the Canadian Health Coalition and the Council of Canadians. They’re organizing a national day of action on March 31 in support of public health care. 


Author's photo
Dennis Gruending is an Ottawa-based author, blogger and a former Member of Parliament. His work will appear on the second and fourth Thursday of the month. His Pulpit and Politics blog can be found at www.dennisgruending.ca.
Readers’ advisory: The discussion below is moderated by The UC Observer and facilitated by Intense Debate (ID), an online commentary system. The Observer reserves the right to edit or reject any comment it deems to be inappropriate. Approved comments may be further edited for length, clarity and accuracy, and published in the print edition of the magazine. Please note: readers do not need to sign up with ID to post their comments on ucobserver.org. We require only your user name and e-mail address. Your comments will be posted from Monday to Friday between 9:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Join the discussion today!

Announcement

New Observer editor and CEO, Jocelyn Bell. Photo by Lindsay Palmer

New editor named

by Observer Staff

Promotional Image

Editorials

David Wilson%

Observations

by David Wilson

A perfect send-off

Promotional Image

Video

ObserverDocs: My Year of Living Spiritually

by Observer Staff

Anne Bokma left the Dutch Reformed Church as a young adult and eventually became a member of the United Church and then the Unitarian Universalists. Having long explored the "spiritual but not religious" demographic as a writer, she decided to immerse herself in practices — like hiring a soul coach, secular choir-singing and forest bathing — for 12 months to find both enlightenment and entertainment.

Promotional Image

Society

November 2017

Trump country

by David Macfarlane

A northern Alabama county voted almost unanimously for Donald Trump in 2016. One year later, the writer, together with photographer Nigel Dickson, travels there to try to understand why.

Faith

November 2017

Involuntary pilgrim

by David Giuliano

The return of a tumour sets David Giuliano on a path he calls his ‘Camino de Cancer’

Faith

October 2017

A tale of two cancers

by Catherine Gordon

One year after the writer discovered she had breast cancer, her sister in California received the same diagnosis. They both recovered, but their experiences were worlds apart.

Society

November 2017

Trump country

by David Macfarlane

A northern Alabama county voted almost unanimously for Donald Trump in 2016. One year later, the writer, together with photographer Nigel Dickson, travels there to try to understand why.

Faith

November 2017

Involuntary pilgrim

by David Giuliano

The return of a tumour sets David Giuliano on a path he calls his ‘Camino de Cancer’

Faith

November 2017

Grey matter

by Trisha Elliott

Is consciousness just a function of the brain — or something more?

Promotional Image