UC Observer logo
UCObserver on SoundCloud UCObserver on YouTube UCObserver on Facebook UCObserver on Twitter UCObserver's RSS Feeds

Make or break client confidentiality?

You run the only substance abuse clinic in your region. One day a new client arrives. He’s your wife’s boss, whose erratic ways have been making her life so miserable that she’s decided to quit her job at the end of the month. Is this a case for breaking client confidentiality?

By Ruth McQuirter Scott and Ken Gallinger

Author's photo
Ruth McQuirter Scott is an educator and member of Port Nelson United in Burlington, Ont.


It would be lovely if I could pick and choose when to be ethical. I could decide to respect client confidentiality just as long as it didn’t negatively affect my own life. Then I would take my wife aside and tell her, in strict confidence, to hang in there — help is on its way. I’d assure her that once we’ve treated her boss, he will return a new man, life at the office will settle down and all will be well.

This scenario, of course, is ludicrous, albeit tempting. I have no more right to betray this client’s confidence than that of a stranger arriving at the clinic.

My experience in running the clinic has shown me how much courage it takes for an addict to admit to having a problem and then to take action. How devastating it would be for him to discover that his substance abuse had been revealed to one of his employees, especially when the leak came from the head of the very clinic where he had sought help. My wife may agree to keeping the information secret, but what would prevent her from using the same logic I did and revealing her boss’s addiction to a co-worker who was also suffering from his erratic behaviour?

As the director of the clinic, I have to model the highest of ethical standards. If it’s all right for me to break client confidentiality, how can I expect others to adhere to this fundamental principle? Before long, the reputation and security of the only substance abuse clinic in the region could be compromised.

I will support my wife as I always have and let her make her decision about resigning based on the information she has available. If possible, I will remove myself from direct treatment of the boss, declaring a conflict of interest. If we must interact, I will let him know of my connection to his work and guarantee his right to confidentiality.



From a purely ethical standpoint, the answer is obvious: of course it’s not a case for breaking confidentiality. Confidence is a relationship of trust, and such relationships depend on being worthy of such trust. So, in the rarefied air of pure ethics, the answer, simply, is no.

But I don’t live in such a pure world. I genuinely care about my client, but I care about my wife more. Our relationship of trust goes back a long way before either of us even met her boss, whose “erratic” behaviour is now making her life hell.

So I’d say to my wife, “You know I can’t talk about my clients. But I can tell you that the behaviour you’re seeing at work is sometimes related to substance abuse. And sometimes, if people like your boss get help from a clinic like ours, they can conquer their addictions and learn to act differently. So you might want to wait a bit before resigning, in case things improve.”

I might even wink when I said it.

Yes, I know — that’s treading perilously close to an outright breach of confidence. But I’m prepared to risk walking that close because I care more for my wife than for her boss.

Maybe she’ll resign anyway; maybe this guy is just a jerk, and his behaviour has nothing to do with addiction. All addicts aren’t nasty, and all nasty people aren’t substance abusers. She needs to make that decision for herself.

One more thought: the boss knows I’m his employee’s husband. Yes, we’re the only clinic in town, but there are other towns and other clinics. I wonder if he chose to come to me in the hope that I’d say something at home, and by doing so, help a valued employee understand her boss’s behaviour.

Readers’ advisory: The discussion below is moderated by The UC Observer and facilitated by Intense Debate (ID), an online commentary system. The Observer reserves the right to edit or reject any comment it deems to be inappropriate. Approved comments may be further edited for length, clarity and accuracy, and published in the print edition of the magazine. Please note: readers do not need to sign up with ID to post their comments on ucobserver.org. We require only your user name and e-mail address. Your comments will be posted from Monday to Friday between 9:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Join the discussion today!
Promotional Image

Editorials

David Wilson%

Observations

by David Wilson

If statues could talk

Promotional Image

Video

ObserverDocs: Stolen Mother

by Observer Staff

The daughter and adoptive mother of one of the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women share their story

Promotional Image

Society

July 2017

From far and wide

by Various Writers

Meet 11 immigrants who are putting down new roots

World

June 2017

A suitcase for Cuba

by Christopher Levan

You’ll find more than giveaway toiletries and hand-me-downs in the writer's luggage. Each carefully chosen gift offers a glimpse into the lives of Cubans today.

Justice

June 2017

Undocumented

by Kristy Woudstra

Up to half a million people are living in Canada without official status. The ‘sanctuary city’ movement is growing, but the fear of deportation persists.

World

June 2017

Resisting genocide

by Sally Armstrong

In August 2014, ISIS attacked Iraq’s Yazidis, slaughtering thousands and forcing women and girls into sexual slavery. Today, the survivors are fighting for their ancient way of life.

Society

April 2017

Dear Grandkids

by Various Writers

Six acclaimed Canadian authors write letters from the heart

Society

March 2017

Called to resist

by Paul Wilson

Liberal Christians in the United States test their faith against a demagogue

Promotional Image