UC Observer logo
UCObserver on SoundCloud UCObserver on YouTube UCObserver on Facebook UCObserver on Twitter UCObserver's RSS Feeds

Honour veterans or promote peace?

Every year on Remembrance Sunday, the church where you minister holds a ceremony to honour the congregation’s veterans and to remember their fallen comrades. The congregation’s peace committee complains that the practice glorifies war and promotes nationalism. They’ve asked you to put a stop to it. How do you handle this?

By Connie denBok and Orville James



So, the peace committee is declaring war on the veterans’ remembrance? It comes as no surprise. The border skirmishes began three years ago with a resolution at the annual meeting. The committee’s motion was defeated, then reintroduced one year later with stronger language and identical results.

My predecessor, Rev. Chamberlain, proposed that the Board accede to the wishes of the committee. He predicted the members would live at peace with their neighbours henceforth. It worked for one year, until the veterans planted poppies in the church flowerbeds and insisted the dove hanging above the chancel be removed because it was taking sides.

The problem, unfortunately, has very little to do with theology or ethics. The issue is values, those slippery, emotional truisms we believe absolute because we feel them so strongly. An unexamined conviction will conjure enemies out of neutral bystanders because those who “don’t get it” are wrong. It will escalate to name calling, marginalization and harsh judgment. Conflict in the name of peace; exclusion of those who don’t buy our vision of inclusion — the ironic pairings are endless.

Churches are particularly susceptible when feelings become the criterion for what is true and right and just. Sometimes a peppering of Bible verses spices the discussion, but the book as a whole supports complexity, right relationships, humility and obedience to a higher power — none of which appeal to combatants.

Will I use my position to “put a stop to it”? Not on your life. We will have to sort it out while living together in community. I’m putting on my referee vest, ready to blow the whistle for slashing, high-sticking and dirty tricks while we master the art of church. God save us from being a people who know the words of Jesus but not his spirit.




Both sides have a point. The peace committee, noting this age of rising nationalism and super-patriotism, rightly wants no glorification of war.

But is that what the advocates of Remembrance Day ceremonies really want? I doubt it. Most veterans I’ve met rarely talk about their war years because war is hell. They carry memories of violence, loss, grief and fear. Few want to relive those experiences.

However, they also do not want to forget the justice that was sought, the sacrifices that were made and the peace that they believe was won. They want to remember and honour colleagues whose sacrifice was supreme.

This is a great opportunity to help people grow in their understanding of one another. Why not bring the groups together?

Using the model and tactics of a conflict-resolution mediator, I will coach a spokesperson from each group — separately and in advance — to describe their concerns, what they want and what they would be comfortable including in a Remembrance Day service. Then I will bring the groups together. I’ll start the meeting with a fervent prayer, that Jesus’ spirit fill the room, that ears will hear and hearts will respect the opinions of others. Then I’ll let the groups share their hopes, desires and concerns — and press both sides to listen and understand.

Once they understand each other, they can work together to shape a service that includes both prayers of commemoration for the past and prayers of peace for the future.

The end result may be a unified group, united in violent agreement.


Readers’ advisory: The discussion below is moderated by The UC Observer and facilitated by Intense Debate (ID), an online commentary system. The Observer reserves the right to edit or reject any comment it deems to be inappropriate. Approved comments may be further edited for length, clarity and accuracy, and published in the print edition of the magazine. Please note: readers do not need to sign up with ID to post their comments on ucobserver.org. We require only your user name and e-mail address. Your comments will be posted from Monday to Friday between 9:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Join the discussion today!
Promotional Image

Editorials

David Wilson%

Observations

by David Wilson

If statues could talk

Promotional Image

Video

ObserverDocs: Stolen Mother

by Observer Staff

The daughter and adoptive mother of one of the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women share their story

Promotional Image

Society

July 2017

From far and wide

by Various Writers

Meet 11 immigrants who are putting down new roots

World

June 2017

A suitcase for Cuba

by Christopher Levan

You’ll find more than giveaway toiletries and hand-me-downs in the writer's luggage. Each carefully chosen gift offers a glimpse into the lives of Cubans today.

Justice

June 2017

Undocumented

by Kristy Woudstra

Up to half a million people are living in Canada without official status. The ‘sanctuary city’ movement is growing, but the fear of deportation persists.

World

June 2017

Resisting genocide

by Sally Armstrong

In August 2014, ISIS attacked Iraq’s Yazidis, slaughtering thousands and forcing women and girls into sexual slavery. Today, the survivors are fighting for their ancient way of life.

Society

April 2017

Dear Grandkids

by Various Writers

Six acclaimed Canadian authors write letters from the heart

Society

March 2017

Called to resist

by Paul Wilson

Liberal Christians in the United States test their faith against a demagogue

Promotional Image