Faith

Debate begins on controversial Middle East peace proposals (Tuesday, Aug. 11, 2009)

Palestinian Christian Nora Carmi (left) and Rabbi Reuven Bulka of Ottawa address commissioners during debate on Middle East proposals Tuesday. Photos by Mike Milne
Palestinian Christian Nora Carmi (left) and Rabbi Reuven Bulka of Ottawa address commissioners during debate on Middle East proposals Tuesday. Photos by Mike Milne

By Mike Milne



More than two hours of deliberation Tuesday afternoon brought The United Church of Canada no closer to clarifying its position on a proposed boycott of Israeli educational and cultural institutions. Part of a series of proposals aimed at encouraging peace in the Middle East, the actions were being considered by a decision-making commission of the church’s General Council, meeting this week in Kelowna, B.C.

While a cadre of regional and national media and lobbyists for and against the proposals watched on, a motion to take no action was tabled and further discussions postponed until later in the week. The only decision was the almost-unanimous adoption of a motion distancing the church from contentious background material that came along with the proposals.

Originating with a Toronto Conference committee, the background material and the pro-boycott motions themselves had prompted accusations of anti-Semitism from Canadian Jewish groups in the weeks leading up to the General Council meeting. The motion passed by the commission “repudiates and regrets language used” in the background information, calling it “provocative, unbalanced and hateful.”

Addressing commissioners, Council guest Rabbi Reuven Bulka of Ottawa said he could not see “the spirit of co-operation” between the United Church and Canadian Jewish groups “continuing if there is a motion to boycott Israel in any way shape or form.”

A Palestinian guest, Nora Carmi of the Sabeel Theology Centre in Jerusalem, urged commissioners to adopt the proposals “to ensure a just and comprehensive peace for Palestinians and Israelis.” She added: “The proposals may be harsh but they are necessary and important at this time.”






Readers’ advisory: The discussion below is moderated by The United Church Observer and facilitated by Intense Debate (ID), an online commentary system. Please note: readers do not need to sign up with ID to post their comments on ucobserver.org. We require only your user name and e-mail address. Your comments will be posted from Monday to Friday between 9:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Join the discussion today!





Advertisement
Advertisement
Related Articles
Courtesy of University of British Columbia

40th General Council Coverage

by Observer Staff  August 2009