UC Observer logo
UCObserver on SoundCloud UCObserver on YouTube UCObserver on Facebook UCObserver on Twitter UCObserver's RSS Feeds

Finish This Sentence

In this age of social media, local churches . . . should take full advantage of it, reasonably and intelligently.

By Brian Platt

Some people view social media as an unmitigated boost to humanity, ushering in an interconnected world where mass communication is at the touch of our fingers. Others are unfailingly grumpy and fatalistic about the new technology, lecturing the rest of us about how we’re destroying personal relationships and our privacy at the same time.

Both of these positions are silly. Social media is a neat tool, but like all new consumer technologies, what you get from it depends on how you use it. Social media doesn’t create new realities; it just affects realities that already exist.

In other words, for United Church congregations, social media isn’t going to solve any problems on its own, nor is it going to single-handedly destroy things we hold sacred. It is certainly not a full replacement for face-to-face outreach. But it would also be a shame to shun social media completely and deprive congregations of a potent resource.

So what can congregations do with social media? I’m no web expert (far from it), but I can think of at least two useful applications. The first is to keep conversations going within the congregation between Sunday services and other weekly or monthly activities. The second is to help attract new people to the congregation.

To put social media to good use, churches need to ensure they have a well-functioning, easy-on-the-eyes website. Many churches don’t have this, and online outreach is pretty much impossible if you don’t have somewhere to send people for more information and discussion. You don’t even necessarily need to pay for a good website; there will almost always be someone connected to your congregation who knows a bit about web programming.

In some ways, social media is perfect for the United Church. Unlike evangelical churches, which are always eager to, you know, evangelize, United Church members tend to be uncomfortable with approaching strangers and spreading the word about why more people should join their congregation. I’m sympathetic to the reason why: it feels like trying to convert people.

Social media interaction, on the other hand, provides an efficient way for people to stumble upon the United Church. And once they stumble upon it, it’s easy for them to learn more.

The initial Emerging Spirit project a few years ago, with its witty and subversive advertising, would have been perfect for the age of social media. I bet those images would have spread around Twitter and Facebook like wildfire, and people would have investigated the source. This is the sort of thing that social media is built for. Alas, the campaign came just a few years too early.

Today, there are countless ways that local churches can make use of social media networks. Plant ideas, start conversations and let them spread. Some of them won’t go far at all; in fact, many of them probably won’t. But if you do it enough, some will spark interest — and that’s how you can reach an audience otherwise difficult to find.

It’s not just local churches that can benefit from social media. This year’s General Council meeting had a fairly successful use of online outreach tools, especially the live video stream that allowed those not in attendance to follow along in real time.

There’s room for improvement, though; there were many fewer people using Twitter than what I usually see during large conferences. Still, those who were tweeting were impressively active throughout the week.

Social media should be part of the communications strategy for the church at every level. The only way to make it so is to let the imagination run wild and start trying a few new things.

Author's photo
Brian Platt is a master of journalism student at Carleton University.
Readers’ advisory: The discussion below is moderated by The UC Observer and facilitated by Intense Debate (ID), an online commentary system. The Observer reserves the right to edit or reject any comment it deems to be inappropriate. Approved comments may be further edited for length, clarity and accuracy, and published in the print edition of the magazine. Please note: readers do not need to sign up with ID to post their comments on ucobserver.org. We require only your user name and e-mail address. Your comments will be posted from Monday to Friday between 9:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Join the discussion today!
Promotional Image


David Wilson%


by David Wilson

If statues could talk

Promotional Image


ObserverDocs: Stolen Mother

by Observer Staff

The daughter and adoptive mother of one of the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women share their story

Promotional Image


July 2017

From far and wide

by Various Writers

Meet 11 immigrants who are putting down new roots


June 2017

A suitcase for Cuba

by Christopher Levan

You’ll find more than giveaway toiletries and hand-me-downs in the writer's luggage. Each carefully chosen gift offers a glimpse into the lives of Cubans today.


June 2017


by Kristy Woudstra

Up to half a million people are living in Canada without official status. The ‘sanctuary city’ movement is growing, but the fear of deportation persists.


June 2017

Resisting genocide

by Sally Armstrong

In August 2014, ISIS attacked Iraq’s Yazidis, slaughtering thousands and forcing women and girls into sexual slavery. Today, the survivors are fighting for their ancient way of life.


April 2017

Dear Grandkids

by Various Writers

Six acclaimed Canadian authors write letters from the heart


March 2017

Called to resist

by Paul Wilson

Liberal Christians in the United States test their faith against a demagogue

Promotional Image