UC Observer logo
UCObserver on SoundCloud UCObserver on YouTube UCObserver on Facebook UCObserver on Twitter UCObserver's RSS Feeds

Finish This Sentence

“In a secular society, churches are . . . a choice. And that’s a good thing.”

By Brian Platt

While hardly news, it sometimes bears emphasizing: secular societies have not been generous to the pews of liberal-minded churches. The result, unfortunately, is that a tone of regret can often be detected when United Church people discuss the secularism of modern times.

I’ll go out on a limb here and assume few Observer readers think church should be mandatory. A core United Church value is that people should be able to make up their own minds about what they believe and what they do with their Sunday mornings. None of us would want to renounce either a progressive theology or a free society. And so whatever it means for membership numbers, it’s a good thing that our society has evolved this way.

Secularism is the principle that public institutions need to serve all citizens equally, meaning that our government should have no role in promoting one religion above others. Although Canada doesn’t have the history of outright theocracy that many European nations do, I think those of us in the under-30 crowd often forget that secularism is still a relatively new thing for this country. At General Council last summer, I was amazed to learn the United Church was formed by an official act of Parliament: the United Church of Canada Act, which received royal assent in July 1924.

Okay, so this isn’t the most nefarious mix of government and religion one can imagine. But less than a century later, it’s absurd to think of our Parliament getting involved in founding a church. There are symbolic ways in which we still aren’t secular; our head of state, the 86-year-old Queen Elizabeth II, holds the title of “Supreme Governor” of the Anglican Church. But in practice, Canada has a remarkably firm separation of government and religion today. Few Canadian politicians are willing to even discuss their faith publicly.

The famous counterpoint to this is the United States, where every presidential frontrunner makes his or her faith a prominent campaign plank, and evangelical churches are not shy about exerting their influence on (mostly Republican) politicians. It’s a strange sociological puzzle how a country with an explicit separation of church and state in its constitution has become the most religious western society — far more so than the many European democracies with monarchies closely connected to an official church.

But even so, the United States is not the chief cautionary example to keep in mind when we think about the value of secularism. If the evangelical lobby there was nearly as powerful as it claims, Barack Obama wouldn’t be on his second presidential term and same-sex marriage wouldn’t be steadily gaining ground.

Instead, we need to remember the number of countries around the world where the government sees religion as its highest order of business — taking the choice entirely out of its citizens’ hands. I have a friend from Iran who is an atheist, but every Iranian government document about her declares her a Shiite Muslim simply because of her family background. She absolutely despises this, yet it is perhaps the least troubling way that religion and government are one and the same in that country, and in many others.

So let’s keep the mournfulness out of the conversation when we talk about today’s culture. Secularism is very much a complement to the United Church, despite the occasional appearance to the contrary. If it means the church has to work harder to reach out to society, that’s probably a good thing too.

Author's photo
Brian Platt is a master of journalism student at Carleton University.
Readers’ advisory: The discussion below is moderated by The UC Observer and facilitated by Intense Debate (ID), an online commentary system. The Observer reserves the right to edit or reject any comment it deems to be inappropriate. Approved comments may be further edited for length, clarity and accuracy, and published in the print edition of the magazine. Please note: readers do not need to sign up with ID to post their comments on ucobserver.org. We require only your user name and e-mail address. Your comments will be posted from Monday to Friday between 9:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Join the discussion today!
Promotional Image


David Wilson%


by David Wilson

If statues could talk

Promotional Image


ObserverDocs: Stolen Mother

by Observer Staff

The daughter and adoptive mother of one of the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women share their story

Promotional Image


July 2017

From far and wide

by Various Writers

Meet 11 immigrants who are putting down new roots


June 2017

A suitcase for Cuba

by Christopher Levan

You’ll find more than giveaway toiletries and hand-me-downs in the writer's luggage. Each carefully chosen gift offers a glimpse into the lives of Cubans today.


June 2017


by Kristy Woudstra

Up to half a million people are living in Canada without official status. The ‘sanctuary city’ movement is growing, but the fear of deportation persists.


June 2017

Resisting genocide

by Sally Armstrong

In August 2014, ISIS attacked Iraq’s Yazidis, slaughtering thousands and forcing women and girls into sexual slavery. Today, the survivors are fighting for their ancient way of life.


April 2017

Dear Grandkids

by Various Writers

Six acclaimed Canadian authors write letters from the heart


March 2017

Called to resist

by Paul Wilson

Liberal Christians in the United States test their faith against a demagogue

Promotional Image