UC Observer logo
UCObserver on SoundCloud UCObserver on YouTube UCObserver on Facebook UCObserver on Twitter UCObserver's RSS Feeds

Generations

Debate about God is a good thing when done intelligently

By Brian Platt

The two greatest physicists of the 20th century, Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr, spent most of their lives at loggerheads over quantum mechanics. Einstein believed deeply in a material, deterministic world; Bohr’s model of the atom, with its physically unpredictable electrons, violated the very core of Einstein’s worldview. “No,” Einstein would famously insist during their heated debates, “God doesn’t play dice with the universe.” Finally, an exasperated Bohr burst out a brilliant reply: “Einstein, stop telling God what to do!”

It certainly raises the stakes of a debate when one starts invoking God’s intentions, doesn’t it? How do you challenge someone when they appropriate God’s authority to their side of an argument? As Bohr knew very well, Einstein was speaking in a mostly metaphorical sense — God as the embodiment of the complexity of the universe. Both scientists understood the limits of such rhetorical language and used it for the constructive purpose of advancing the argument.

But others are not so metaphorical or subtle. In June, the demagogues who rule Iran didn’t just fix an election result: Ayatollah Khamenei pronounced the outcome “a divine assessment.” How should one respond to this? The thousands of Iranians who doubted that it was God who tabulated poll results impossibly early and shut down the cellphone network were met in the streets by a phalanx of black-clad security forces.

Last January, a Canadian umbrella group of atheist and humanist organizations launched a campaign of public transit advertisements. The ads carried the cheeky and rather cunning slogan, “There’s probably no God, so stop worrying and enjoy your life.” (The mad geniuses at the United Church’s Emerging Spirit headquarters produced a good response to this, which you can see at wondercafe.ca.)

I have yet to see the atheist bus ads in person. That’s because Vancouver’s transit authority decided to ban them. The reason: no ads are allowed that may “cause offence to any person or group of persons or create controversy.” Got that, Vancouverites? Transit advertisements are for selling you overhyped products, not for provoking thought — let alone controversy!

This will change with a Supreme Court ruling in July that struck down Vancouver’s ban as a violation of the Charter right to free expression. The decision will almost certainly apply to religious advertisements as well. Now we’ll be able to see these atheist bus ads, think about them and make up our own minds. Is anybody in the United Church afraid of such a thing? Why would you be?

Debate about God, when done intelligently, is a very good thing. We need more of it. A century ago in Copenhagen, two brilliant minds used  such debate to decipher the mysteries of the physical universe — launching a scientific revolution in the process. Today in Tehran, where the freedom to debate religious doctrine is violently repressed, ordinary citizens risk everything in their struggle to gain it. Vancouver’s attempt to keep debate about God away from the public space is a symptom of seriously misplaced priorities.

Religious debate is a fundamental tenet of human freedom. So stop worrying and enjoy it.

Author's photo
Brian Platt is a master of journalism student at Carleton University.
Readers’ advisory: The discussion below is moderated by The UC Observer and facilitated by Intense Debate (ID), an online commentary system. The Observer reserves the right to edit or reject any comment it deems to be inappropriate. Approved comments may be further edited for length, clarity and accuracy, and published in the print edition of the magazine. Please note: readers do not need to sign up with ID to post their comments on ucobserver.org. We require only your user name and e-mail address. Your comments will be posted from Monday to Friday between 9:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Join the discussion today!

Interviews

Courtesy of Pixabay

Why this woman is leaving the Catholic Church in her 60s

by Angela Mombourquette

After a lifetime devoted to Catholicism, a Nova Scotia teacher is settling in with the United Church of Canada. Here, she explains why.

Promotional Image

Editorials

Jocelyn Bell%

Observations: It’s a long road toward full equality for women

by Jocelyn Bell

'It’s a wonder that we continue to see male ministers as normative and attach shame to female ministers’ biology and sexuality.'

Promotional Image

Video

ObserverDocs: Playing by Heart

by Observer Staff

United Church music director Kara Shaw was born prematurely, became almost totally blind and was later diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Today, the 28-year-old showcases her unique musical ability, performing piano on local and national stages.

Promotional Image

Faith

May 2018

Toronto church builds interfaith friendship

by Vivien Fellegi

Faith

May 2018

This parent found no support for her autistic daughter — and decided to change that

by Kieran Delamont

Suzanne Allen talks about raising a daughter on the autism spectrum and bringing all autistic girls together

Faith

May 2018

Church retreat helps first responders with PTSD

by Joe Martelle

Interviews

May 2018

Why this woman is leaving the Catholic Church in her 60s

by Angela Mombourquette

After a lifetime devoted to Catholicism, a Nova Scotia teacher is settling in with the United Church of Canada. Here, she explains why.

Ethics

May 2018

Pregnant in the pulpit

by Trisha Elliott

Ministers who take a maternity leave still face discrimination in their own congregations

Interviews

May 2018

The two words Rev. Cheri DiNovo wants to hear from the United Church

by Alex Mlynek

The Toronto minister talks about her disappointment over the church’s silence when she officiated the country’s first legalized same-sex marriage 17 years ago – and why she wants an apology.

Promotional Image