UC Observer logo
UCObserver on SoundCloud UCObserver on YouTube UCObserver on Facebook UCObserver on Twitter UCObserver's RSS Feeds

Generations

End-of-life choices

By Patricia Clarke

His name is Legion. Or John. He is 85. His wife is dead; so are most of his friends. He doesn’t see very well so he can’t read. He used to argue politics but he can no longer speak coherently and anyway there’s no one to listen. He’s had heart attacks and he’s had cancer but thanks to the ministrations of seven doctors and their eight different daily medications, he lives on. As far as I know, no one has asked him whether he wants to.

Her name is Legion, too. Or Mary. At 72, physically healthy, she is locked in an institution. All day she babbles incomprehensibly. Sometimes she gets angry and throws things. She spits and scratches at the attendants, so they tie her hands to her chair. She would be better off, her husband admits, if she could die. But she can’t.

Then there’s Tom. He’s alive, if you can call it that, only because machines keep his lungs breathing and his heart pumping. The doctors say it’s hopeless. His family insists: somehow, someone, somewhere can save Dad.

You probably know people like this. I do. As the baby boomers reach their 80s, their numbers will double, some with dementia, others with ailments that once took our lives, but with modern medicine we live on. And that’s a good thing. Isn’t it?

The mythical Tithonus didn’t think so. The gods gave him eternal life but inadvertently also eternal old age. In Tennyson’s poem, he begs the gods to take back their gift: “happy men that have the power to die.”

Rev. Don Matheson often meets Tithonus in his work with long-term care patients at a Toronto seniors’ home. “So many say to me, ‘I wish I could just die.’” To have that power when life becomes a burden is not possible now. Whether it should be possible is an issue, Matheson thinks, that will soon be as contentious as abortion.

Medical technology has outrun our ethics. When is enough, enough? What kind of care can we provide when there are twice as many Marys with dementia? If medical treatment has to be rationed, can I buy my way to the head of the line so my husband can live another month, while my neighbour’s husband dies on the waiting list? Are we willing to pay enough taxes to provide immediate, unlimited medical service to everyone no matter the cost? If not, where do we draw the line, and who draws it?

These are public policy decisions, but policy-makers need guidance. We need to talk to them now about the value of life and the meaning of death. Is life, prolonged at any cost, the ultimate value?

Two generations ago, when most people died at home, death was no stranger and sometimes a welcome friend. Now death comes, mostly, to hospitals and nursing homes, out of sight, out of mind. Maybe that makes it harder to accept it as a natural, inevitable part of life. As Rev. Rob Fennell of the Atlantic School of Theology says, ours has become a death-defying, death-denying culture.

And yet, Fennell reminds us, “Death isn’t the end of the story.” We don’t know what is, but as a wise Maritime minister, Rev. Flemming Holm, said on his deathbed, “Let God surprise me.”

Patricia Clarke is a writer and editor in Toronto.



Readers’ advisory: The discussion below is moderated by The UC Observer and facilitated by Intense Debate (ID), an online commentary system. The Observer reserves the right to edit or reject any comment it deems to be inappropriate. Approved comments may be further edited for length, clarity and accuracy, and published in the print edition of the magazine. Please note: readers do not need to sign up with ID to post their comments on ucobserver.org. We require only your user name and e-mail address. Your comments will be posted from Monday to Friday between 9:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Join the discussion today!

Interviews

Courtesy of Pixabay

Why this woman is leaving the Catholic Church in her 60s

by Angela Mombourquette

After a lifetime devoted to Catholicism, a Nova Scotia teacher is settling in with the United Church of Canada. Here, she explains why.

Promotional Image

Editorials

Jocelyn Bell%

Observations: It’s a long road toward full equality for women

by Jocelyn Bell

'It’s a wonder that we continue to see male ministers as normative and attach shame to female ministers’ biology and sexuality.'

Promotional Image

Video

ObserverDocs: Playing by Heart

by Observer Staff

United Church music director Kara Shaw was born prematurely, became almost totally blind and was later diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Today, the 28-year-old showcases her unique musical ability, performing piano on local and national stages.

Promotional Image

Faith

May 2018

Toronto church builds interfaith friendship

by Vivien Fellegi

Faith

May 2018

This parent found no support for her autistic daughter — and decided to change that

by Kieran Delamont

Suzanne Allen talks about raising a daughter on the autism spectrum and bringing all autistic girls together

Faith

May 2018

Church retreat helps first responders with PTSD

by Joe Martelle

Interviews

May 2018

Why this woman is leaving the Catholic Church in her 60s

by Angela Mombourquette

After a lifetime devoted to Catholicism, a Nova Scotia teacher is settling in with the United Church of Canada. Here, she explains why.

Ethics

May 2018

Pregnant in the pulpit

by Trisha Elliott

Ministers who take a maternity leave still face discrimination in their own congregations

Interviews

May 2018

The two words Rev. Cheri DiNovo wants to hear from the United Church

by Alex Mlynek

The Toronto minister talks about her disappointment over the church’s silence when she officiated the country’s first legalized same-sex marriage 17 years ago – and why she wants an apology.

Promotional Image