The Parti Quebecois government has created controversy by proposing the Charter of Quebec Values aimed at restricting public sector employees from wearing religious symbols — turbans, head scarves, skullcaps and presumably crosses — in their workplaces.
The PQ claims that this would unify Quebecers behind the idea of a secular state, but Charles Taylor, the well-known academic who co-chaired a provincial commission into reasonable accommodation in 2007, describes the proposal as an “absolutely terrible act of exclusion.”
So the debate is on. Former Quebec Premier Bernard Landry has lashed out at English Canadian media for “Quebec bashing” while covering the matter. Landry told CBC Radio’s As It Happens
that Quebec welcomes immigrants but wants them to join society. "When you change country, you change country,” he said. “And you have to get first the language, then the culture and integrate.” In the same interview, Landry even goes on to ridicule the idea of police wearing turbans, which harks back to the Reform Party’s 1989 convention resolution stating that Sikhs should be barred from wearing turbans in the RCMP.
Landry’s comments on religious accommodation obviously shift quickly to
immigration policy although individuals barred from wearing religious
symbols would likely include native-born Quebecers.
opinion polling shows that 58 percent of Quebecers support the Charter
of Quebec Values, compared to 42 percent in the rest of Canada. The Montreal Gazette
reports that support for the charter was highest among people who vote Conservative — at 49 percent.
It’s interesting that right-leaning commentators, including The Globe and Mail’s Margaret Wente
use what they see as the failed immigration policies of Europe as a
basis for claiming that Canada’s multiculturalism policies are failing
Not so, says Professor Will Kymlicka
the Canada research chair in political philosophy at Kingston’s Queen’s
University. Kymlicka says that what passes for analysis is often really
anecdote and hunch. He adds that research across national boundaries
indicates that Canada is, in fact, successful in the integration of
immigrants and their children, and that policies — aimed at promoting
social cohesion among a variety of racial and ethnic groups — play a
role in that success.
Multiculturalism was even included in
Pierre Trudeau’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which is perhaps
another reason why Landry doesn’t like it. He instead argues that
Canada will long come to regret its policy of multiculturalism, which he
says creates racial and ethnic ghettoes.
And so, we are left
with the odd spectacle of the Parti Quebecois, which has always claimed
to be progressive and socially democratic, promoting policies resembling
those of Canada’s Right.
Keep it free!
If you enjoy reading our online stories about ethical living, justice and faith, please make a donation to the Friends of The Observer Fund. Supporting our award-winning journalism will help you and others to continue to access ucobserver.org for free in the months to come.