UC Observer logo
UCObserver on SoundCloud UCObserver on YouTube UCObserver on Facebook UCObserver on Twitter UCObserver's RSS Feeds
Rev. Susan Beaver speaks before General Council 43. (Credit: Richard C. Choe)

Indigenous church cautiously optimistic about General Council changes

The United Church has voted to create a new National Indigenous Elders Council and a National Indigenous Spiritual Gathering, among other commitments.

By Mike Milne

General Council 43 was significant in the United Church’s continuing journey toward better relations with its Indigenous leaders and communities of faith. Indigenous church people were more present, visible and heard than at any Council meeting in recent memory.

As the Truth and Reconciliation Commission has shown, the church’s relationship with Indigenous communities has been fraught, extending back further than the United Church’s 93-year history. But the meeting in July gave the church a glimpse of what self-determination looks like, through the airing of Indigenous concerns and the groundbreaking adoption of Calls to the Church. The calls were created by Indigenous church leaders and were sent to General Council by its Executive last fall.

In the introductory plenary session, Adrian Jacobs, keeper of the circle at the United Church’s Sandy-Saulteaux Spiritual Centre in Beausejour, Man., showed wampum belts that illustrate treaties between First Nations. He said they signify “not a rights-based agreement, but a responsibility” accepted by two groups. In considering the calls, General Council was facing a similar agreement. “We are at a very pivotal time,” Jacobs told commissioners. “We have the desire to move ahead together.”

The report was open for adoption or rejection, but not discussion or alteration. In a later interview, general secretary Nora Sanders said respect for the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which the General Council Executive adopted in 2016, means the report needed to be received. “It isn’t for the rest of the church to tinker with and try to improve,” she said, “but for us to figure out our part.” Commissioners voted almost unanimously to adopt the report and applauded its passage. 

Laying out what it describes as a “framework for reconciliation,” the report affirms that Indigenous ministries “will decide for ourselves who we are,” determine what training programs are needed, and promote an “Indigenous understanding of the Christ story.” The calls will shift the relationship between the Indigenous and broader United Church “to mutuality and respect,” says Rev. Maggie Dieter, executive minister of the Aboriginal Ministries Circle and Indigenous justice.

“We are at a very pivotal time [...] We have the desire to move ahead together.”

As part of an implementation package, commissioners agreed to create an eight-member National Indigenous Elders Council that will advise other parts of the church; create a decision-making National Indigenous Organization; hold a National Indigenous Spiritual Gathering every three years, starting next August; and develop clusters and networks, including a national network of urban Indigenous ministries. Implementation will also include collaboration with non-Indigenous parts of the church.

The Calls report states that the church is “rich in land and properties” that were “stolen by false promises in treaty negotiations,” and suggests that at least some of the proceeds from sales of decommissioned church properties should be given back to Indigenous ministries. The implementation motion doesn’t outline a way to ensure this will happen, but some individual congregations are already choosing to do so as awareness grows.

In some Indigenous communities of faith, though, there is skepticism about the wider church’s commitment. “To be completely honest,” says Rev. Susan Beaver of Grand River United in Six Nations, “I would sort of characterize it as making a new treaty. And the people have absolutely no faith that the treaty will be upheld or that it will mean anything.”

She continues, “I don’t necessarily believe that is true. I think there is room to work.” In her community, though, the attitude is largely “wait and see.”


Readers’ advisory: The discussion below is moderated by The UC Observer and facilitated by Intense Debate (ID), an online commentary system. The Observer reserves the right to edit or reject any comment it deems to be inappropriate. Approved comments may be further edited for length, clarity and accuracy, and published in the print edition of the magazine. Please note: readers do not need to sign up with ID to post their comments on ucobserver.org. We require only your user name and e-mail address. Your comments will be posted from Monday to Friday between 9:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Join the discussion today!

Faith

Chris Pratt's church, while claiming to accept everyone, states in its doctrine of faith that marriage should only be between one man and one woman. (Photo: Chris Pratt/Instagram)

Celebrity megachurches need to clarify LGBTQ acceptance: pastor

by Emma Prestwich

Zoe Church, where actor Chris Pratt worships, may not truly "open their doors" to everyone, like he claims.

Promotional Image

Editorials

The United Church Observer's editor and publisher, Jocelyn Bell. (Photo: Lindsay Palmer)

'The Observer' will soon relaunch with a new name and design

by Jocelyn Bell

Our magazine will be going through some changes, but we see blue skies ahead

Promotional Image

Video

Meet beloved church cats Mable and Mouse

by Observer Staff

They're a fixture of Kirk United Church Centre in Edmonton.

Promotional Image

Society

February 2019

Marriage problems: Is the ancient tradition worth saving?

by Pieta Woolley

Bitterness and boredom seem to define many mid-life marriages, but we might not have to settle for apathy ever after

Ethics

February 2019

A Yukon artist and a Tlingit trapper create this stunning jewelry

by Amy van den Berg

The fur jewelry in Whitehorse boutique store V. Ægirsdóttir is creating a new possibility for future partnerships with the region's trappers

Columns

February 2019

Why white people need to stop asking, 'where are you from?'

by Mike Sholars

"...For all intents and purposes, Canada is the only home I really recognize or remember. But none of that matters if I look like I don’t belong, and that single question makes that abundantly clear every single time."

Promotional Image